About
Fraud

Fraud

Tracking how regulators, AGs, and class plaintiffs are pursuing deceptive practices, false claims, and consumer-fraud theories - and where enforcement is sharpening.

16 entries in Litigator Tracker

LawSnap Briefing Updated June 22, 2026

State of play.

  • The FTC has obtained a court order freezing a $250M subscription-fraud network — the Genesis Tech action targets 15 corporations and eight individuals operating through shell companies and offshore entities, alleging ROSCA and FTC Act violations across apps including MadMuscles, Nebula, and PDF Guru .
  • FTC loss data confirm the fraud environment is worsening at scale: Americans reported $15.9 billion in total fraud losses in 2025, with imposter scams alone accounting for $3.5 billion — a trajectory that signals sustained regulatory and enforcement focus across all channels .
  • The Biglaw insider trading ring remains the dominant criminal development: 30 defendants charged across Sidley, Latham, Cleary, Goodwin, Weil, Willkie, and Wachtell, with nine guilty pleas, named co-conspirators still employed at Biglaw firms as recently as 2026, and the investigation explicitly ongoing .
  • Super Micro's export-control indictment has compounded into a multi-front exposure: DOJ charges against three individuals for diverting $2.5 billion in AI servers to China sit on top of prior Nasdaq delisting, SEC accounting charges, BDO's adverse internal-controls opinion, and active investor class actions .
  • For counsel advising technology companies, subscription-service operators, or financial-services clients, the practical baseline is simultaneous exposure across criminal, civil, and regulatory channels — subscription-fraud enforcement is now targeting international corporate structures, AI-platform consumer claims are entering federal court, and prediction-market insider trading has produced its first criminal charges.

Where things stand.

  • FCA enforcement is at record levels and expanding in scope. DOJ FY2025 recoveries of $6.8 billion — the highest ever — are anchored in healthcare but now explicitly extend to DEI employment practices through the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative, with the IBM $17 million settlement as the template for qui tam plaintiffs .
  • The FOCUS initiative formalizes data-miner qui tam partnerships. Data miners filed a record 1,297 FCA cases in FY2025 and accounted for over 45 percent of complaints since FY2024; FOCUS creates a pre-filing consultation channel that DOJ will use to triage quality and potentially strengthen enforcement posture against weaker algorithmic suits .
  • Healthcare fraud enforcement has a new geographic and structural footprint. The West Coast Strike Force adds Northern California, Arizona, and Nevada to an existing nine-district model; CMS is running predictive audits on hospice providers and has imposed an accelerated Medicaid provider revalidation mandate on all states; and the Eleventh Circuit has expanded criminal exposure for false ownership disclosures on CMS-855 enrollment forms .
  • Subscription-fraud enforcement is targeting international corporate structures. The Genesis Tech action demonstrates that the FTC will pursue asset freezes and individual liability against offshore-structured networks exploiting app-store enforcement gaps; ROSCA is the primary statutory vehicle .
  • Prediction markets are now a regulated enforcement zone. The CFTC's first insider-trading action on event contracts, combined with the DOJ's commodities-fraud prosecution of the Google engineer charged over Polymarket bets using confidential search data, establishes that existing commodities and securities fraud frameworks apply to these platforms .
  • Law firm liability in Ponzi scheme recoveries is being quantified. A jury found Baker Donelson liable for negligent supervision in connection with a $164.5 million Mississippi timber Ponzi scheme; the receiver is seeking at least $2.8 million in damages — a data point for how courts value firm-level exposure in fraud recoveries .
  • PFAS omission claims are clearing the pleading stage. In Cavalier v. Apple, a Northern California federal court preserved fraudulent concealment, UCL, false advertising, and CLRA claims — accepting an omission-based theory without explicit "PFAS-free" marketing and permitting a potentially nationwide class based on representative testing .
  • Whistleblower infrastructure is expanding on multiple fronts. The GAO has validated whistleblower program efficiency; FinCEN has proposed awards of 10-30% for AML and sanctions violations; and the SEC's narrow "voluntary" disclosure standard — denying an award to the Deutsche Bank ESG whistleblower who published in the WSJ before filing — remains a contested interpretive question .
  • AI-powered wire fraud has become the dominant financial crime vector. According to FBI IC3 data cited in practitioner reporting, cybercrime losses reached $16.6 billion in 2024; business email compromise has surged since generative AI became widely available; and Deloitte projects GenAI deepfake fraud losses could reach $40 billion in the US by 2027 .
  • The Second Circuit has narrowed insurers' ability to deny no-fault claims based on provider kickbacks. The panel vacated GEICO's summary judgment win and certified to the New York Court of Appeals whether anti-kickback violations automatically disqualify providers from no-fault reimbursement eligibility; hundreds of similar cases are in limbo pending the state court's answer .
  • State AGs are enforcing consumer-fraud theories through existing statutes. State AG offices have expanded antitrust and consumer protection enforcement, with the False Claims Act now carrying a first-of-its-kind DEI-related resolution and healthcare providers facing heightened scrutiny .

Latest developments.

Active questions and open splits.

  • Biglaw information-barrier liability after the Nourafchan ring. The indictment names seven elite firms and references unnamed co-conspirators still employed at Biglaw institutions; the open question is whether DOJ pursues civil actions against the firms themselves and whether the case triggers regulatory scrutiny of information-barrier protocols industry-wide .
  • Prediction-market insider trading — what theory governs. The Google engineer prosecution charges commodities fraud and wire fraud rather than securities fraud; the legal theory for nonpublic corporate data used in prediction markets has no settled precedent, and the outcome will define employee-trading policies for every data-rich employer .
  • AI subscription misrepresentation — what disclosure standard applies. The Anthropic class action tests whether usage-cap disclosures buried in terms of service satisfy consumer protection standards when marketing materials promise specific usage multiples; no settled standard exists for AI-platform subscription terms, and a class certification ruling would set the template .
  • PFAS omission liability without affirmative "PFAS-free" claims. Cavalier v. Apple accepted a function-conflict theory — chemical contamination inconsistent with health-focused marketing — without requiring explicit false statements; whether other circuits follow and how broadly courts define "health-oriented" product categories remains open .
  • Whether the DEI-FCA enforcement theory survives constitutional challenge. The IBM settlement establishes the DOJ's theory, but a coalition challenge to EO 14398 is pending; an injunction would freeze the DEI-FCA enforcement vector while denial would accelerate qui tam filings .
  • No-fault reimbursement eligibility after kickback violations. The Second Circuit's certification to the New York Court of Appeals leaves hundreds of similar cases in limbo; insurers cannot rely on categorical disqualification while providers facing kickback allegations have strengthened reimbursement defenses pending the state court's answer .
  • Law firm negligent supervision exposure in fraud recoveries. The Baker Donelson damages proceeding will produce a quantification methodology for firm-level liability in Ponzi scheme cases — the first significant data point for how receivers value supervision failures at major firms .

What to watch.

  • Genesis Tech preliminary injunction proceedings — whether the court's asset freeze withstands challenge given the defendants' offshore corporate structures, and what asset-recovery mechanisms the FTC deploys against international entities.
  • Anthropic class action — early motions practice on whether usage-cap disclosures satisfy consumer protection standards, and whether other AI platforms face parallel filings.
  • Expansion of the Biglaw insider trading investigation — whether DOJ unseals additional defendants, pursues civil actions against implicated firms, or triggers bar disciplinary proceedings against named attorneys.
  • New York Court of Appeals answer to the Second Circuit's certified question on no-fault reimbursement eligibility — the ruling will reset leverage in hundreds of pending no-fault fraud cases.
  • Outcome of the constitutional challenge to EO 14398 and FAR clause 52.222-90 — an injunction would freeze the DEI-FCA enforcement vector; denial accelerates qui tam filings.
  • Google engineer Polymarket prosecution — how DOJ frames the commodities fraud theory at trial and whether the case produces guidance on employee trading policies for data-rich technology employers.

16 Contributing Entries

California expands PFAS fraud case against DuPont spinoffs over asset transfers

California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a Second Amended Complaint in the state's PFAS litigation, alleging that DuPont-related companies executed fraudulent asset transfers designed to shield themselves from environmental liability. The complaint targets E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, DuPont de Nemours, Inc., Corteva, Inc., The Chemours Company, and newly created Qnity Electronics. Bonta contends that corporate restructuring and amended agreements shifted the bulk of PFAS-related liabilities onto Chemours while reducing exposure for New DuPont, Corteva, and Qnity Electronics. The filing invokes the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act and the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act, and seeks relief in U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina.

FTC, Utah, and California Sue Hims & Hers Over Health Data and Billing Practices

The FTC, joined by Utah and California, sued telehealth company Hims & Hers Health, Inc. on July 29, 2026, in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges that Hims shared consumers' sensitive health information with third-party ad platforms including Meta and Snap despite privacy commitments, and that it charged customers for prescriptions immediately after intake forms were completed—before any provider consultation occurred. The agencies also claim Hims misled customers about billing, subscriptions, and cancellation procedures. The FTC alleges violations of the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act (ROSCA), while Utah and California assert violations of state consumer protection and false-advertising statutes.

FTC, Utah, and California Sue Hims & Hers Over Health Data Sharing

The FTC, joined by Utah and California, filed a federal complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Hims & Hers Health, Inc., alleging the telehealth company shared consumers' sensitive health information with third-party advertising platforms including Meta and Snap while publicly promising privacy protection. The complaint also charges that Hims & Hers misled users about billing and cancellation practices. According to the filing, the company disclosed health-related data and customer lists through tracking technologies embedded on its website, charged consumers for prescriptions immediately after intake forms were submitted—before any provider consultation occurred—and deliberately made subscriptions difficult to cancel. The FTC alleges violations of the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act (ROSCA), while Utah invokes the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act and California cites its False Advertising and Unfair Competition laws.

American Healthcare Systems Files Amended Complaint Against Former Counsel Over Takeover Scheme

American Healthcare Systems Corp. and its founder Mike Sarian filed an amended complaint in California state court on Tuesday, July 7, 2026, accusing their former in-house counsel Faisal Gill of orchestrating an extortion and takeover scheme. The complaint also names Dr. Aramais Paronyan, a minority shareholder and director, as a participant in efforts to remove Sarian from control and restrict his access to company finances. AHS operates five Florida hospitals, including Palmetto General and Coral Gables Hospital.

Brands Warn as Creators Flood TikTok Shop with AI Avatar Affiliate Videos

TikTok Shop is being flooded with AI-generated product demonstrations, fake creator personas, and duplicate avatars that are undercutting human creators and eroding consumer trust. Merchants and affiliate creators are using TikTok's built-in AI tools to mass-produce makeup tutorials, clothing reviews, and product showcases without holding inventory—a low-cost strategy that prioritizes algorithmic reach over authenticity. Some operators have deployed synthetic personas, including a fabricated Black creator named "Aliyah," to sell dropshipped goods from retailers like Shein, exploiting algorithmic biases that reward emotional connection to creators.

Florida AG subpoenas Anthony Fauci in multi-state probe over COVID-era self-dealing

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has issued an investigative subpoena to Dr. Anthony Fauci as part of a coordinated multi-state probe into whether Fauci personally profited from his COVID-19 guidance through awards, grants, book deals, board positions, and other financial arrangements. West Virginia Attorney General John McCuskey and Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill are conducting parallel investigations. The Florida subpoena demands documents spanning January 3, 2020 to present, including records of grants, awards, professorships, book deals, communications with Florida businesses, and materials concerning vaccine efficacy, booster recommendations, natural immunity, myocarditis risks, messaging strategies, and manufacturer communications. Florida is framing the inquiry as an investigation into potential "self-dealing" and whether Fauci's public health recommendations generated personal financial benefit in violation of state law.

California Judge Keeps Flextronics IP-Theft Suit Against Former GC Deputy Alive

A federal judge in California has refused to dismiss a lawsuit accusing Christopher Ricci, former deputy general counsel at Flextronics AP LLC, of orchestrating the transfer of company patents to AutoConnect, a Virginia startup he secretly co-founded. The decision allows Flextronics' claims of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and trade secret misappropriation to proceed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California under case number 5:26-cv-00117-PCP.

UN releases 2026 International AI Safety Report warning of enormous benefits and existential risks

The United Nations released the International AI Safety Report 2026, a comprehensive assessment concluding that advanced artificial intelligence presents both transformative opportunities and escalating dangers. The report, led by the UN agency for digital technology, finds that AI can accelerate development in health, education, and financial services in developing nations while simultaneously enabling cyberattacks, deepfake fraud, non-consensual intimate imagery, and biological weapon design. The core finding: AI capabilities in critical fields like biological research are advancing faster than governance frameworks, creating a dangerous gap between what is technologically possible and what remains safe.

OpenAI Adds Brad Bondi to Defense in Florida AG AI Safety Lawsuit

OpenAI has retained Brad Bondi, a Paul Hastings partner and co-chair of the firm's investigations and white-collar defense practice, to bolster its legal team in Florida's lawsuit. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier filed the case on June 1, 2026, in state court, accusing OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman of misleading the public about ChatGPT's safety and contributing to harms including violence and self-harm. The complaint alleges gross negligence, public nuisance, strict liability, and violations of Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, claiming OpenAI knowingly released the product while concealing safety risks and suppressing internal warnings.

Former Mayo Clinic AI Director Sues System Over Alleged Retaliation and AI Safety Cover-Up

Traci Tamiko Eto, former research director at Mayo Clinic, filed a federal lawsuit on July 6, 2026, alleging retaliation and wrongful termination after she raised concerns about AI safety failures and patient privacy violations. According to the complaint, Eto was demoted in July 2025, placed on involuntary medical leave, and fired in December 2025 when her position was eliminated in a reduction in force that reportedly affected only her role. The suit was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota under the False Claims Act's retaliation provision, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Family and Medical Leave Act.

Nike and Lululemon sued in California over alleged fake discount pricing

Nike and Lululemon face separate class action lawsuits alleging "phantom discount" pricing schemes on their online platforms. Both companies are accused of displaying artificially inflated struck-through prices to exaggerate the depth of sales discounts and mislead consumers about actual savings. Nike was sued on July 21, 2026 by Corinne Pearson in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California over pricing on its website and mobile app. The complaint cites specific examples, including Air Max 2017 sneakers allegedly kept on discount beyond the 90-day window permitted under California's False Advertising Law without proper disclosure of when the original price was actually in effect. The proposed class covers California purchasers who bought Nike products at a discount since July 21, 2022. Lululemon faces a parallel suit filed by Annette Cody in Los Angeles Superior Court, which alleges the company listed products with fictitious regular prices. One example cited involves Wunder Train high-rise tights marked down from $98 to $59, allegedly without having sold at the higher price for months.

Kentucky Judge Declines AI Sanctions Against Attorneys With Remorse

A Kentucky federal judge declined to sanction two attorneys who submitted a brief containing AI-generated errors, finding that their demonstrated remorse and clean disciplinary history made a warning sufficient deterrent. The attorneys, representing a notary public in a fraud case, had inadvertently included fabricated citations and legally incorrect propositions generated by artificial intelligence. They accepted responsibility immediately and expressed genuine remorse that the judge found credible, leading to the decision against fines or disciplinary referrals.

Amazon Rejects Kathy Hao's Renewed Motion to Dismiss in Trademark Fraud Suit

Amazon has asked a federal judge in Washington to reject California attorney Kathy Hao's renewed motion to dismiss a trademark fraud lawsuit, claiming she is simply restating arguments from a prior motion that relied on AI-generated hallucinations. The company filed its opposition to keep the case alive, asserting that Hao's latest filing presents no new legal ground and merely recycles previously rejected content.

Arizona Attorney Maren Bam Faces Sanctions for Bogus AI-Generated Quotes in Employment Case

A federal judge in Arizona is weighing fee sanctions against attorney Maren Bam for submitting a brief laced with fabricated legal citations and AI-generated quotations in an employment discrimination case. U.S. Magistrate Judge Alison S. Bachus identified the violations in Bam's plaintiff's opening brief in a Phoenix Suns discrimination matter, where 19 of the brief's legal citations were generated by artificial intelligence. Only 5 to 7 of those cases actually existed or supported the propositions attributed to them. The brief also contained fake quotations falsely attributed to Arizona federal judges. Bam, a Washington State attorney operating pro hac vice in the District of Arizona, runs a nationwide Social Security disability practice.

Visa to buy BioCatch for $2.4B in cash to expand fraud defenses

Visa announced Monday that it has signed a definitive agreement to acquire BioCatch, a Tel Aviv-based fraud intelligence company, for $2.4 billion in cash. BioCatch's platform uses behavioral biometrics and device signals to detect account takeovers, money mule activity, application fraud, and scams before they result in losses. The company serves hundreds of banking clients globally and analyzes patterns including keystroke timing, touchscreen interactions, and device behavior to identify fraudulent activity.

Bankruptcy Judge Rejects Reed Smith Bid to Force Arbitration in Eletson RICO Case

Reed Smith failed to compel arbitration of civil RICO and fraud claims brought by Eletson Holdings and its former shareholders in bankruptcy court. Judge John P. Mastando III ruled Monday that the firm's engagement-letter arbitration clause—labeled a "New York Arbitration Clause"—was limited to fee disputes under New York's Part 137 rules and did not extend to allegations of racketeering, fraud, or fiduciary wrongdoing. The judge also denied Reed Smith's alternative motion to dismiss in the 96-page opinion.

mail Subscribe to Fraud email updates

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

Also on LawSnap