Delaware Chancery Rejects Berg's Section 225 Claim Over Fabricated Documents

Published
Score
8

Why it matters

Berg v. Bar-Lavi, a Section 225 stockholder dispute in Delaware Court of Chancery, ended with dismissal after the court found that plaintiff Berg had submitted fabricated corporate documents to establish his standing as a stockholder. Judge Lori W. Will ruled that Berg lacked valid stockholder status under DGCL § 108, rendering his written consents to appoint directors ineffective. The court characterized Berg's document fabrication as bad-faith conduct. Defendants Bar-Lavi and others faced lesser sanctions for false affidavit statements, with the court shifting 50 percent of fees to the defendants.

The underlying dispute centered on deficient corporate record-keeping at closely-held entities controlled by the parties. Berg's fabricated records—including back-dated documents—were uncovered during the expedited Chancery review. The specific nature of the entities and the full scope of the record deficiencies remain unclear from available filings.

Section 225 proceedings are designed to resolve director election disputes quickly by examining record ownership validity alone, excluding beneficial ownership claims or collateral issues. The decision signals Delaware courts' strict approach to litigation fraud in corporate governance matters. Practitioners handling stockholder disputes in closely-held entities should note the court's emphasis on document authenticity and the risks of submitting questionable records, even when underlying record-keeping is poor.

mail

Get notified about new Litigator Tracker

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

Also on LawSnap