AI Court Rules

5 entries in Litigator Tracker

5 Contributing Entries

Law And Technology Artificial Intelligence AI Vendor Assessment AI Court Adoption AI Court Rules Privacy Contracts

Score

Courts Tighten AI Security Rules, Raising Costs for Small Law Firms

State courts and court administration bodies are imposing enterprise-grade security requirements on legal AI tools, including encryption, access controls, audit logs, and vendor documentation such as SOC 2 reports and software bill of materials. The National Center for State Courts has incorporated these standards into its 2025 guidance for AI use in court systems. Judges have also begun issuing protective orders that restrict how AI tools may process confidential information, limiting training, data retention, and output deletion.

July 30, 2026

Details arrow_forward

Law And Technology Artificial Intelligence AI Hallucination Incident AI Professional Ethics Litigation AI Legal Malpractice AI Court Rules AI Attorney Accountability

Score

Connecticut Supreme Court orders lawyer CLE after ChatGPT citation errors

The Connecticut Supreme Court sanctioned Wallingford attorney Ian Gottlieb for submitting briefs containing fabricated legal citations and quotations generated by ChatGPT. Gottlieb, who practices at GLG Law LLC, filed the defective briefs in two landlord-tenant appeals involving fair rent commission decisions in Middletown and Hartford. The court found the errors reflected negligence in AI use rather than intentional misconduct, and ordered Gottlieb to complete six additional hours of continuing legal education in ethics and law office management. Gottlieb acknowledged at the hearing that he failed to adequately review the AI-generated material before filing.

August 3, 2026

Details arrow_forward

Law And Technology Artificial Intelligence Health Care Intellectual Property Privacy AI Capability Research AI Liability Framework AI Transparency Disclosure Fraud AI Generated Content IP Content Authenticity Deepfake Detection AI Access To Justice AI Attorney Accountability AI Identity Verification AI National Security Energy M & A AI Education AI Legal Malpractice AI Legal Research AI Professional Ethics AI Vendor Assessment AI Federal Framework AI Financial Advisory AI Insurance Coverage AI Insurance Industry Regulatory Fragmentation SEC Enforcement AI State AG Enforcement Energy Grid AI Semiconductor Supply AI Clinical Tools AI Mental Health Consumer Health AI Healthcare Compliance Healthcare Interoperability Rural Healthcare AI Copyright Training AI Identity Rights Open Source AI Licensing Patent AI Trade Secret Litigation AI Arbitration Adr AI Assisted Drafting AI Content Moderation AI Court Adoption AI Court Rules AI Discovery Privilege AI Hallucination Incident AI Unauthorized Practice AI Due Diligence AI Startup Funding AI Training Data Biometric Privacy Cross Border Data Data Breach Response Health Data Privacy State Privacy Law AI Audit Automation Cross Domain Claim Type AI Bias Audit AI Preemption

Score

UN releases 2026 International AI Safety Report warning of enormous benefits and existential risks

The United Nations released the International AI Safety Report 2026, a comprehensive assessment concluding that advanced artificial intelligence presents both transformative opportunities and escalating dangers. The report, led by the UN agency for digital technology, finds that AI can accelerate development in health, education, and financial services in developing nations while simultaneously enabling cyberattacks, deepfake fraud, non-consensual intimate imagery, and biological weapon design. The core finding: AI capabilities in critical fields like biological research are advancing faster than governance frameworks, creating a dangerous gap between what is technologically possible and what remains safe.

July 1, 2026

Details arrow_forward

Artificial Intelligence Law And Technology AI Attorney Accountability AI Court Rules AI State Legislation AI Court Adoption

Score

Texas Supreme Court Proposes AI Misuse Rules with Sanctions and Filing Attestations

The Texas Supreme Court has proposed new procedural rules requiring lawyers to certify they have verified all AI-generated content before filing and imposing specific sanctions for violations. The rules mandate explicit attestations of accuracy, directly addressing the rapid adoption of generative AI tools by Texas attorneys. This proposal follows the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA), signed by Governor Greg Abbott on June 22, 2025, and effective January 1, 2026, which establishes civil penalties of $10,000 to $200,000 for AI misuse in legal contexts.

June 29, 2026

Details arrow_forward

Law And Technology Litigation AI Hallucination Incident AI Attorney Accountability Artificial Intelligence AI Legal Malpractice AI Court Rules AI Court Adoption AI Professional Ethics AI Legal Research AI Assisted Drafting

Score

Connecticut Courts Ban Unverified AI Filings, Threatening Case-Ending Sanctions

Connecticut's Appellate and Supreme Courts have imposed mandatory verification requirements for all AI-generated citations, legal authorities, and evidence effective June 23, 2026. The rules threaten case-ending sanctions—including nonsuit or default judgment—for violations. The directive emerged from enforcement action against GLG Law LLC and a landlord's attorney whose filings contained ChatGPT-induced errors, including fabricated quotations and faulty citations. The Connecticut Judicial Branch and its AI Committee developed the policy, which now applies to all attorneys and pro se litigants in state courts.

July 15, 2026

Details arrow_forward

mail Subscribe to AI Court Rules email updates

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.