AI Court Adoption

AI Court Adoption

3 entries in Litigator Tracker

Legal Ethics Roundup Covers Bondi Exit, Bove Recusal, AI Sanctions, Viral Judge Scandals

University of Houston law professor Renee Knake Jefferson's "Legal Ethics Roundup" (LER No. 126, published April 6, 2026) summarizes recent U.S. legal ethics developments, including Pam Bondi's departure from a role, Emil Bove's recusal, a "Strip Law" issue, widespread judge AI use amid lawyer sanctions, and viral judge misconduct videos.[1][2]

Judiciary Seeks Feedback on Adapting PD 57AD for Gen AI in Disclosure

England and Wales's judiciary-established working group concluded a review of Practice Direction 57AD at year-end 2025, examining how the Civil Procedure Rules mandate technology use in disclosure for Business and Property Courts. The directive, in force less than four years, predates generative AI's emergence and contains no specific guidance on its use. The working group launched an industry survey to gather feedback on PD 57AD's current operation, identify necessary changes to accommodate advancing AI and technology-assisted review, and determine whether a best practice guide is needed.

Real-Time Tech Reshapes Legal Standards for Attorney Competence

Real-time litigation technologies are reshaping what courts expect from attorneys. Live transcription, annotation tools, and AI-assisted analysis during depositions are now standard in many practices, forcing a recalibration of professional competence. Traditionally, competence meant legal knowledge, procedural mastery, case preparation, and courtroom skill. The profession is now adding technological proficiency and responsible tool deployment to that baseline. Dean Whalen, chief legal officer of Readback, has emerged as a leading voice on this shift, which affects defense attorneys, prosecutors, and judges across litigation practice.

mail

Get notified about new AI Court Adoption developments

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

Also on LawSnap