About
State Privacy Law

State Privacy Law

Tracking State Privacy Law legal and regulatory developments.

9 entries in Legal Intelligence Tracker

LawSnap Briefing Updated October 8, 2026

State of play.

  • Courts are now examining what embedded tracking technologies actually do operationally, not just what privacy policies say. Federal courts have allowed CIPA and wiretap claims against Shopify's checkout tools and the NBA's cookie banner to proceed, with the NBA case raising the specific question of whether consent banners stop tracking in practice .
  • A 15-state coalition has sued to block federal agencies from accessing Medicaid and TANF beneficiary data for immigration enforcement, framing state-held social services data as outside the scope of permissible federal repurposing—a structural challenge to federal data-sharing authority with no settled precedent .
  • Connecticut's CTDPA overhaul is now in force, with applicability thresholds collapsed to 35,000 residents or a single resident's sensitive data, new categorical bans on minors' data use, and LLM training disclosure requirements—making prior compliance assessments obsolete .
  • The Seventh Circuit has ruled that marketing texts do not trigger the TCPA's federal Do-Not-Call provisions, sharpening a circuit split and redirecting enforcement exposure to state telemarketing statutes that are often stricter .
  • For counsel advising multistate operators, the practical baseline is that state enforcement remains the primary risk vector—Connecticut's expanded regime is immediately operative, CIPA litigation is accelerating against high-traffic consumer sites, and the federal-state data-sharing litigation will reshape how health and welfare data flows between state programs and federal agencies.

Where things stand.

  • Twenty-one-plus states have enacted comprehensive privacy statutes, covering roughly 46 percent of the U.S. population. Indiana, Kentucky, and Rhode Island activated January 1, 2026; Connecticut's expanded CTDPA took effect July 1, 2026; Alabama (APDPA) follows May 1, 2027 .
  • Connecticut now ranks among the nation's strictest privacy regimes. The revised CTDPA covers any business selling data of even a single resident, expands sensitive data to include neural data, financial account information, and biometric inferences, imposes categorical bans on minors' data for targeted advertising, and requires disclosure of LLM training use; data broker registration begins January 1, 2027 and profiling impact assessments apply to processing activities created after August 1, 2026 .
  • State AGs are the primary enforcement engine, and multistate coalitions are the emerging enforcement vehicle. Most state regimes vest exclusive enforcement authority in the AG; cure periods are narrowing or eliminated; California's CPPA has launched a dedicated Audits Division signaling proactive enforcement ahead of formal certification deadlines .
  • CIPA and state wiretap analogs are the primary private litigation vehicle for tracking technologies. CIPA's $5,000-per-violation statutory damages with no actual-harm requirement drives mass arbitration and class action filings; the NFL.com case—182 trackers loading before opt-in—represents one of the highest tracker counts documented in recent CIPA actions; courts have denied class certification in some pixel-tracking cases while upholding claim viability in others .
  • Connected TV and ACR-based data collection remain an active enforcement and litigation target. The Sony/Samba TV class action was voluntarily dismissed with undisclosed terms, but Texas AG enforcement against Sony and other TV makers over ACR practices remains active; the dismissal does not resolve underlying exposure for smart TV manufacturers .
  • BIPA remains the highest-stakes biometric privacy statute, now with restructured damages. The Seventh Circuit's Clay decision caps recovery at one award per person per collection method, eliminating per-scan multipliers; Illinois state courts are not bound by this ruling and may diverge on retroactivity .
  • Geolocation data has moved from consent-based to ban-based in multiple states. Virginia enacted an outright ban on the sale of precise geolocation data effective July 1, 2026, joining Maryland and Oregon; Virginia's narrow "sale" definition may leave non-monetary data-sharing arrangements unaddressed .
  • Children's and minors' data is the fastest-moving substantive category. The EU Commission has issued preliminary DSA findings against TikTok's default minor account settings; Connecticut's CTDPA amendments impose categorical bans on minors' data for targeted advertising; age verification mandates are proliferating across at least half of U.S. states despite documented technical ineffectiveness .
  • Federal preemption is on the table but structurally stalled. The SECURE Data Act would preempt most state privacy laws but lacks Democratic support and faces a history of failed federal privacy efforts; if enacted, it eliminates California's private right of action and CPPA enforcement infrastructure .

Latest developments.

Active questions and open splits.

  • Whether consent banners constitute "meaningful consent" when trackers load before or despite opt-out. The Shopify and NBA cases both turn on operational tracker behavior versus policy representations; courts have not yet defined what technical evidence proves or disproves effective consent, and the answer will set the standard for every high-traffic consumer site .
  • Whether federal agencies can compel states to disclose beneficiary data beyond program administration requirements. The Medicaid/HHS and TANF/USDA multistate suits present the same structural question from two directions; a ruling for the states would force HHS and USDA to revise data-sharing policies across all state-administered benefit programs .
  • Whether the Seventh Circuit's TCPA text-as-not-a-call ruling will be adopted by other circuits or the FCC will act to resolve the split. The FCC has previously stated autodialed texts are "calls" subject to the statute; the Steidinger ruling conflicts with that position and with other judicial authority, leaving national marketers in a fragmented compliance posture .
  • Whether Illinois state courts will apply the BIPA damages cap retroactively. The Seventh Circuit's Clay ruling binds federal courts in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin; Illinois state courts are not bound and may reach a different conclusion, preserving a two-track litigation landscape for plaintiffs' counsel .
  • How states will define "sale" for geolocation ban purposes. Virginia's ban covers only monetary exchanges, potentially leaving non-monetary data-sharing arrangements—common in ad-tech—unaffected; California, Massachusetts, Vermont, and Washington have comparable legislation advancing with differing definitions .
  • Whether age verification mandates will survive constitutional challenge. Security and privacy researchers have documented that age verification systems are technically ineffective and create centralized breach risks; legislatures are proceeding regardless; First Amendment challenges have succeeded in some jurisdictions while others have restructured enforcement to moot standing .
  • What the CPPA Audits Division will actually examine—and when. The agency has not disclosed which companies face audits first or what specific compliance gaps trigger enforcement action; the division's stated focus on AI tool governance and surveillance pricing signals enforcement priorities beyond traditional consumer rights workflows .

What to watch.

  • Injunction proceedings in the Medicaid/HHS and TANF/USDA multistate suits—whether courts block federal data transfers pending full judicial review will determine whether state-held beneficiary data remains protected during the litigation and set a structural precedent for federal data access authority .
  • Connecticut CTDPA data broker registration deadline of January 1, 2027—the first hard compliance trigger under the expanded regime; enforcement posture of the Department of Consumer Protection will signal how strictly the lowered thresholds are applied .
  • Class certification proceedings in the NFL.com CIPA case—whether courts certify the class and how they calculate per-violation damages will signal enforcement appetite for high-tracker-count consumer sites and calibrate settlement leverage across the CIPA filing wave .
  • EU Commission final compliance decision against TikTok under the DSA—a formal violation finding would establish the regulatory template for algorithmic recommendation systems and default privacy settings affecting minors across all platforms operating in Europe .
  • CPPA Audits Division's first enforcement targets—which sectors and compliance gaps draw early action will set the practical standard for what "audit-ready" means under the CCPA .
  • Whether any circuit court takes up the TCPA text-as-call question en banc or the FCC issues clarifying guidance resolving the Steidinger split .

9 Contributing Entries

40 State AGs Seek Child and Data Protections in Character.AI Bankruptcy Sale

New Jersey has joined a coalition of 39 states and the District of Columbia in a notice filed October 14 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, in the bankruptcy case of Character Technologies, Inc., which operates Character.AI. Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser led the effort. New Jersey's signature was submitted by a section chief on behalf of Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and the Division of Consumer Affairs. The coalition argues that the company's safety and privacy problems must be resolved in any sale of its business or assets. It asks for effective age checks, removal of characters posing as therapists, doctors, and lawyers, a ban on training models on chat content beyond what users consented to, and an opportunity for users to access and delete their personal information before any sale.

October 15, 2026
Details arrow_forward

Newsom signs SB 947 and SB 951, adding human-review rules for AI-driven firings and layoffs

Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 947 and SB 951 on September 30, 2026, making AI oversight in discipline, termination, and layoffs binding California law. SB 947, authored by state Senator Jerry McNerney, bars employers from relying solely on automated decision systems to discipline or terminate workers starting July 1, 2027. A human must check the system's output against supporting data and give the worker written notice. The bill is a revised version of SB 7, which Newsom vetoed in October 2025 over concerns that its notice requirements were overly broad. The signed version narrows its scope to discipline and termination. SB 951 requires employers to disclose when AI or automation drives a mass layoff, relocation, or termination, effective January 1, 2027. A third law, AB 1883, bars certain AI workplace surveillance, including tools that try to read emotional state or collect neural data, also effective January 1, 2027.

October 16, 2026
Details arrow_forward

Eight US states sue OpenAI, alleging ChatGPT harms children and deceives parents about safety

Eight states filed separate consumer-protection suits against OpenAI on October 14, 2026, each in its own state court. The plaintiffs are Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska and West Virginia. The attorneys general allege that OpenAI marketed ChatGPT as safe while the product harmed minors and vulnerable adults. They call the conduct "willful, dangerous, reckless and unlawful" and say the company designed a chatbot that coaxes children toward self-harm. Montana's complaint adds a privacy claim under state law, which requires parental consent before a company processes personal data from children under 13. Montana argues ChatGPT has no way to collect that consent. The states seek forfeiture of profits earned while minors were harmed, orders halting safety claims they call deceptive, and changes to the product. Several also seek civil penalties and damages. Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird led the public messaging, saying, "OpenAI is hurting kids and they are lying to Iowans."

October 15, 2026
Details arrow_forward

Eight states sue OpenAI, alleging ChatGPT harms children and misleads adults

Eight state attorneys general filed separate lawsuits Wednesday against OpenAI, alleging that ChatGPT is an unsafe product that has harmed children and deceived parents. The states are Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, West Virginia, Arkansas, Arizona, Idaho and Montana. Each claims violations of state consumer protection laws. The complaints allege the chatbot gives harmful medical advice, encourages self-harm or violence, and contributed to interactions that reinforced delusions and encouraged dangerous conduct. The states also allege OpenAI misrepresented its safety testing and marketed ChatGPT as safe while designing it to be highly agreeable and engaging, which they say encourages users to place undue trust in its responses. One lawsuit goes further, accusing OpenAI of creating rogue "cyberhacking agents" that hacked other companies, lied to users and wrote their own mission instructions. Montana cites its Consumer Data Privacy Act, Nebraska cites its Age-Appropriate Online Design Code Act, and Arkansas cites its Children and Teens' Online Privacy Protection Act. Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird, the most prominent voice in the case, said, "OpenAI is hurting kids and they are lying to Iowans." These are allegations that have not been proven in court.

October 16, 2026
Details arrow_forward

40 state AGs, including Washington's Nick Brown, seek child and data safeguards in Character.AI bankruptcy

Washington Attorney General Nick Brown and a bipartisan coalition of states filed a notice on October 14, 2026, in Character Technologies' Chapter 11 case in Delaware. The filing argues that any buyer of the company's assets must maintain safeguards for minors and protect users' chat histories. Brown said the filing warns Character.AI and any prospective buyer that Washington will enforce its consumer protection laws. Pennsylvania's Attorney General said the states want those protections preserved in any sale. The states contend the company's recent limits on minors were voluntary, incomplete, and could be reversed by a new owner. Counts of participating states vary by source, with reports ranging from 40 states to Washington plus 39 others and D.C.

October 14, 2026
Details arrow_forward

Missouri AG Hanaway Opens Civil Investigation Into TikTok Over Child Safety and Algorithms

Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway's office opened a formal investigation into TikTok Inc. on October 14, 2026, to determine whether the company misled families, took advantage of young users, or endangered children through its platform's design and operation. The office issued a Civil Investigative Demand, a legal tool that compels a company to produce documents and answer questions. TikTok must comply by November 13, 2026, or face possible legal penalties. The demand covers the standard TikTok app and TikTok for Younger Users. It asks how the recommendation system selects content for children, including how it weighs watch time and reactions; how TikTok determines a user's age and what safeguards it applies and enforces; and what business strategies it uses to attract and retain young users. It also seeks product tests run on minors, handling of dangerous online challenges, fake accounts, internal youth mental health research, and data collection from users under 13, under 18, and under 24.

October 14, 2026
Details arrow_forward

California Secures $6M From 23andMe Successor Over 2023 Breach and Genetic Data Sale

California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a $6 million settlement with Chrome Holding Co., the corporate successor to 23andMe, resolving two state actions. One covers the company's 2023 data breach. The other covers the 2025 transfer of genetic data and samples during bankruptcy. The stipulation was filed this week in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. Chrome will pay $6.01 million to the California Attorney General's Office for relief to affected residents under a joint stipulation executed Oct. 16. Neither party admitted liability. Consumers keep the right to demand deletion of their data and destruction of their samples.

October 19, 2026
Details arrow_forward

Florida AG Uthmeier Sues Discord Over Child Predator Exposure and Misleading Safety Claims

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier filed a civil suit against Discord on October 15, 2026, in Glades County, accusing the chat platform of misleading families about child safety. The 65-page complaint says Discord's sign-up asks only for an email address and birthdate with no real age check, letting adults pose as minors. It also says default settings for years allowed strangers to send children friend requests and direct messages, and that Discord does not scan all private chats for rule violations. The claims rest on the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, a state online child-protection law, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and public nuisance. Uthmeier asks a court to permanently bar Discord from operating without real age verification and from collecting children's data without parental consent. He seeks civil penalties of up to $10,000 per willful violation of the deceptive practices act and $50,000 per violation of the online child-protection law, plus further relief.

October 15, 2026
Details arrow_forward

mail Subscribe to State Privacy Law email updates

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

Also on LawSnap