About
FTC Enforcement

FTC Enforcement

Tracking FTC, DOJ, and state-AG antitrust enforcement - merger reviews, deceptive-practices actions, monopolization cases, and the regulators' shifting priorities.

10 entries in Legal Intelligence Tracker

LawSnap Briefing Updated June 22, 2026

State of play.

  • The FTC under Chair Ferguson has pivoted enforcement priorities sharply toward consumer-protection fundamentals — subscription fraud, data security, imposter scams, and DEI-as-antitrust — while the structural antitrust docket (Live Nation remedies, algorithmic pricing, Big Tech) continues in parallel .
  • Subscription fraud enforcement has escalated to enterprise-scale takedowns. The Genesis Tech action — 15 corporations, 8 individuals, $250M in app revenue, $700M in connected PayPal flows, and a temporary asset freeze — is the largest ROSCA-based action in the current enforcement cycle and signals that the FTC is pursuing offshore corporate structures aggressively .
  • The FTC is now framing coordinated DEI hiring standards as antitrust collusion. The Diversity Lab closure following warning letters to 42 law firms is the first instance of the agency treating industry-wide DEI certification programs as potential Sherman Act Section 1 violations — a theory with reach well beyond the legal industry .
  • State AG coalitions remain independently consequential. The Live Nation/Ticketmaster verdict and the Nexstar-Tegna post-close injunction confirm that federal clearance or settlement does not terminate antitrust exposure; state coalitions are pursuing structural remedies on their own timelines .
  • For counsel advising consumer-facing platforms, subscription businesses, edtech firms, or any company participating in industry-wide hiring or pricing programs, the practical baseline is that the FTC's enforcement perimeter has expanded simultaneously in multiple directions — ROSCA, data minimization, TAKE IT DOWN Act, and DEI-as-collusion are all live exposure vectors right now.

Where things stand.

  • ROSCA/subscription enrollment standard is hardening through both enforcement and litigation. The Genesis Tech asset freeze is the most aggressive ROSCA action to date; Judge Tigar's Uber ruling in N.D. Cal. holds that pre-stored payment credentials cannot substitute for fresh affirmative consent at enrollment — a standard that extends to any auto-enrollment business .
  • Data minimization and breach-notification obligations are now binding consent-order terms for edtech. The Illuminate Education final order requires data deletion, a public retention schedule, a comprehensive security program, and ongoing FTC monitoring — going well beyond breach response to impose pre-breach data governance obligations .
  • TAKE IT DOWN Act enforcement is live. The FTC began enforcing the statute's 48-hour removal obligation for nonconsensual intimate imagery and AI-generated deepfakes; covered platforms must assign request IDs, notify users of removal decisions, and implement hashing tools — but the FTC's specific compliance standards and penalty thresholds remain partially opaque .
  • DEI coordination is now an antitrust enforcement vector. The FTC's warning letters to 42 law firms and the resulting Diversity Lab closure frame shared demographic hiring targets and information-sharing calls among competitors as potential Sherman Act Section 1 violations — a theory the agency has signaled it will extend to other sectors .
  • Live Nation/Ticketmaster verdict opens structural remedies phase. The 33-state coalition secured a jury finding of unlawful monopolization; DOJ had already settled mid-trial for $280M plus fee caps and divestiture of 13 amphitheater contracts; Judge Subramanian is overseeing remedies that could include forced Ticketmaster divestiture .
  • Algorithmic pricing is under simultaneous federal and state scrutiny. The DOJ-RealPage settlement — the first of its type — prohibits use of competitors' nonpublic data for price recommendations and imposes a court monitor; surveillance pricing investigations are expanding into retail, grocery, hotel, and hospitality; 40+ state bills have been introduced .
  • FTC is enforcing against deceptive AI advertising claims. The Cox Media Group settlement over "active listening" advertising claims and the FTC's active scrutiny of AI-generated ad creatives — combined with New York's synthetic-performer disclosure law now in effect — create compounding compliance exposure for brands running cross-platform campaigns .
  • HSR filing regime has reverted to pre-2025 requirements. The Fifth Circuit vacated the FTC's 2024 HSR overhaul; parties file under the lighter prior form; the size-of-transaction threshold is $133.9M .
  • Imposter scam losses signal sustained enforcement focus on fraud prevention. FTC data document $3.5 billion in reported imposter scam losses in 2025 — the highest-volume fraud category — and $15.9 billion in total fraud losses across all categories, confirming that financial services, government, and technology clients face elevated impersonation risk .
  • State AGs are blocking transactions that federal regulators cleared. The Nexstar-Tegna injunction — halting a closed $6.2B deal on Clayton Act §7 grounds — establishes that multistate coalitions will act independently when DOJ and FCC step aside .
  • Google Play Store antitrust settlement is in final approval with a fee dispute. Judge Hamilton rejected class counsel's $85M fee request as "shockingly huge"; the $700M settlement — $630M to consumers, $70M to 53 state AGs — and required Play Store practice changes are not in dispute, only lawyer compensation .

Latest developments.

  • FTC obtains temporary asset freeze against Genesis Tech subscription-fraud network — 15 corporations, 8 individuals, apps including MadMuscles, Nebula, and PDF Guru, $250M in global revenue, $700M in connected PayPal flows — alleging ROSCA and FTC Act violations through concealed offshore corporate structure
  • FTC reports $3.5 billion in imposter scam losses in 2025, with $15.9 billion in total fraud losses across 3 million reports — confirming sustained regulatory focus on fraud prevention across financial services, government, and technology sectors
  • FTC and California DFPI distribute $2.8 million in refunds to 1,821 homeowners victimized by the Golden Home Services / Home Matters USA mortgage relief scheme; operators banned from telemarketing and debt relief industries
  • FTC finalizes consent order against Illuminate Education for 2021 breach exposing 10 million student records — binding obligations include data deletion, public retention schedule, and comprehensive security program; signals pre-breach data governance enforcement for edtech
  • Diversity Lab closes following FTC warning letters to 42 law firms alleging Mansfield Certification's shared demographic hiring targets and information-sharing calls constitute Sherman Act Section 1 and FTC Act Section 5 violations
  • AI-generated advertising compliance pressure intensifies as FTC enforces against deceptive AI ad claims and New York's synthetic-performer disclosure law takes effect June 9, 2026 — requiring conspicuous notice for AI-generated human likenesses in visual ads
  • FTC settles with Cox Media Group over deceptive "active listening" advertising claims; TAKE IT DOWN Act enforcement is live with 48-hour removal obligation for nonconsensual intimate imagery and deepfakes
  • FTC begins TAKE IT DOWN Act enforcement — covered platforms must establish notice-and-removal systems, assign request IDs, notify users, and implement hashing tools; specific penalty thresholds not yet published
  • French Competition Authority fines Doctolib €4.665M for below-threshold acquisition under abuse-of-dominance theory — first such sanction — as France simultaneously raises merger notification thresholds for the first time in over two decades
  • Judge Hamilton rejects $85M fee request in Google Play Store $700M antitrust settlement as "shockingly huge" — fee dispute is the remaining obstacle to final approval

Active questions and open splits.

  • DEI coordination as antitrust collusion — how far does the theory travel? The FTC's Mansfield Certification theory — that shared demographic hiring targets and competitor information-sharing calls constitute Section 1 coordination — has no appellate precedent. Whether it survives challenge, and whether the agency extends it to healthcare, finance, and tech DEI consortia, is the most consequential open question in the current enforcement cycle .
  • ROSCA offshore-entity enforcement and asset recovery. The Genesis Tech preliminary injunction froze assets held through shell companies and offshore entities. Whether the court's order reaches those assets, and whether individual liability attaches to the eight named defendants, will define the practical limits of ROSCA enforcement against internationally structured operations .
  • TAKE IT DOWN Act compliance standards remain partially opaque. The FTC has not fully detailed what compliance looks like — specific removal mechanics, the threshold for triggering enforcement, and the penalty structure are all unclear. Platforms are building infrastructure against an enforcement framework that has not been fully published .
  • Structural remedies for Live Nation. The remedies phase before Judge Subramanian is the live question — whether the state coalition pursues divestiture of Ticketmaster, forced venue divestitures, or accepts behavioral remedies. The answer defines the vertical-integration risk template for other concentrated industries .
  • Trade-association price-benchmarking as a coordination mechanism. The DOJ egg-producer theory — that using a shared industry benchmarking service to set prices constitutes Sherman Act coordination — is untested at trial. If sustained, it creates exposure for any industry where competitors share pricing data through a common intermediary .
  • Surveillance pricing: where is the line between lawful dynamic pricing and unlawful personalized pricing? The FTC's Section 6(b) study and the House investigation have not yet produced a clear standard; California's AB 2564 would draw the line at individual consumer data, but federal preemption of state rules is unresolved .
  • Below-threshold merger exposure in cross-border deals. The French Doctolib decision — sanctioning a sub-threshold acquisition under abuse-of-dominance theory after raising notification thresholds — signals that deals structured to avoid mandatory filing remain vulnerable to ex post challenge. Whether US enforcers adopt analogous theories for sub-HSR-threshold acquisitions by dominant platforms is an open question .

What to watch.

  • FTC enforcement actions against law firms that received Mansfield Certification warning letters — whether the agency pursues settlements with conduct restrictions or files complaints will clarify the operational scope of the DEI-as-collusion theory.
  • DOJ egg-producer complaint when filed: the specific coordination theory and whether the benchmarking service is named as a co-defendant will determine how broadly the theory travels to hospitality, healthcare, and agriculture.
  • Live Nation remedies phase: whether the state coalition moves for structural relief (Ticketmaster divestiture) or accepts behavioral remedies, and Judge Subramanian's response.
  • FTC publication of detailed TAKE IT DOWN Act compliance guidance — platforms are operating against an enforcement framework with gaps; any published standards will immediately reset compliance baselines.
  • Genesis Tech preliminary injunction proceedings: whether the asset freeze holds against challenge from offshore-entity defendants, and whether the FTC pursues individual liability against the eight named individuals.
  • Surveillance pricing: whether the FTC moves from Section 6(b) study to formal rulemaking, and whether California AB 2564 advances — either would force a federal preemption confrontation.

10 Contributing Entries

12 State AGs Sue to Block $110B Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger

On July 13, 2026, a coalition of 12 state attorneys general filed a federal antitrust lawsuit challenging Paramount Skydance Corporation's $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. Led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta and joined by officials from Minnesota, Oregon, and nine other states, the plaintiffs argue the merger violates the Clayton Act by eliminating competition between two of Hollywood's five major film distributors and cable operators. The states contend the deal would raise movie ticket and cable prices, reduce employment in the entertainment sector, and diminish consumer choice in news and entertainment programming.

Blank Rome Sued Over May 2026 Data Breach Exposing 57K Clients' Data

Blank Rome LLP, a Philadelphia-based law firm, faces two proposed class-action lawsuits over a data breach that exposed sensitive information on 57,554 current, former, and prospective clients. The breach occurred in May 2026 when a cybercriminal impersonated the firm's IT department and convinced an attorney to upload client files to an external Google Drive account. The exposed data includes names, Social Security numbers, addresses, dates of birth, driver's license numbers, passport numbers, medical records, and health insurance information. Blank Rome announced the breach to affected clients on June 26, 2026—nearly a month after the incident occurred. The firm stated it will "aggressively defend" against the suits and claims they lack merit.

FTC Seeks Public Comment on AI Policy Statement Curbing Ideological Manipulation

The Federal Trade Commission has opened a public comment period on a proposed policy statement addressing AI companies' manipulation of system outputs to serve undisclosed ideological objectives. The FTC asserts that such conduct violates Section 5 of the FTC Act by constituting unfair or deceptive practices that undermine consumer expectations for accuracy and objectivity. Comments are due by July 31, 2026, and will be published on Regulations.gov. FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson authorized the notice with a 2-0 vote and invited feedback from businesses and consumers about their experiences with AI system manipulation.

Twelve Blue States Sue to Block Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger After DOJ Clearance

Twelve states led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed an antitrust lawsuit Monday to block Paramount Skydance Corp.'s acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, challenging an $81–$111 billion transaction. The states argue the merger would eliminate competition, raise prices for TV bundles, reduce content output and quality, and harm movie theaters and basic cable distributors. The defendants are Paramount Skydance, backed by David Ellison and sovereign wealth funds from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Abu Dhabi, and Warner Bros. Discovery, which owns HBO, CNN, and other major media properties. Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Washington joined California in the suit.

12 State AGs File Antitrust Lawsuit to Block $110B Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger

On July 13, 2026, New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport joined a 12-state coalition filing an antitrust lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to block Paramount Skydance Corporation's $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. The states argue the merger violates federal antitrust law by substantially lessening competition in film and television. The coalition—led by attorneys general from California, New York, and Pennsylvania—is demanding that Paramount and Warner Bros. pause the transaction and has threatened to seek a temporary restraining order if the companies attempt to close the deal.

12 States Sue to Block $111B Paramount-Warner Bros Merger After DOJ Approval

A coalition of 12 states filed suit in federal court on July 13, 2026, to block Paramount Skydance's $111 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. Led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, the states—California, New York, Washington, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, and Oregon—argue the merger violates the Clayton Act by creating monopolies in film distribution and cable news. The lawsuit represents the first major legal obstacle to the deal since the Department of Justice cleared it on June 12 after an eight-month antitrust review.

Writers Guild of America sues to block $111B Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery merger

The Writers Guild of America filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on July 14, 2026, to block the $111 billion merger between Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery. The union alleges the deal violates the Clayton Antitrust Act by creating a "single mega-buyer" that would suppress wages and reduce competition across episodic television, streaming series, and theatrical screenwriting markets. The filing came one day after twelve Democratic-led states, led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, announced their own federal antitrust challenge to the same transaction.

FTC Proposes Policy Treating Undisclosed AI Output Steering as Deceptive Under Section 5

On July 1, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission issued a proposed policy statement applying Section 5 of the FTC Act to AI companies that manipulate their systems' outputs contrary to consumers' reasonable expectations for truth and accuracy. The FTC is accepting public comment through July 31, 2026. The Commission voted 2-0 to authorize the Federal Register notice.

Lawyers Moonlight to Train AI While Scammers Impersonate Immigration Attorneys

The legal profession faces a convergence of ethics crises driven by artificial intelligence and fraud. Attorneys are increasingly taking side work training AI models, while scammers deploy AI-generated deepfakes and cloned identities to impersonate immigration lawyers and steal from vulnerable clients. The problem intensified with the exposure of Washington State attorney Alexandra Lozano, who fabricated thousands of domestic abuse and trafficking narratives to secure humanitarian visas without client consent. Her scheme, which enlisted hundreds of employees across Colombia, Mexico, and Argentina to process fraudulent applications, affected tens of thousands of immigrants and drained client bank accounts while exposing victims to deportation risk.

FTC Drops Nationwide Noncompete Ban as State Laws Create 2026 Patchwork

The Federal Trade Commission formally withdrew its proposed nationwide ban on noncompete agreements in February 2026, ending an enforcement effort that began in April 2024. A federal court in Texas blocked the rule in August 2024, and the FTC subsequently abandoned its appeal in September 2025 under Chair Andrew Ferguson. The agency removed the regulation from the Code of Federal Regulations on February 12, 2026. The FTC has shifted to case-by-case enforcement rather than broad rulemaking, signaling a policy realignment under the Trump administration that favors targeted action over sweeping regulations.

mail Subscribe to FTC Enforcement email updates

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

Also on LawSnap