Contracts

California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a Second Amended Complaint in the state's PFAS litigation, alleging that DuPont-related companies executed fraudulent asset transfers designed to shield themselves from environmental liability. The complaint targets E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, DuPont de Nemours, Inc., Corteva, Inc., The Chemours Company, and newly created Qnity Electronics. Bonta contends that corporate restructuring and amended agreements shifted the bulk of PFAS-related liabilities onto Chemours while reducing exposure for New DuPont, Corteva, and Qnity Electronics. The filing invokes the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act and the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act, and seeks relief in U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina.

State courts and court administration bodies are imposing enterprise-grade security requirements on legal AI tools, including encryption, access controls, audit logs, and vendor documentation such as SOC 2 reports and software bill of materials. The National Center for State Courts has incorporated these standards into its 2025 guidance for AI use in court systems. Judges have also begun issuing protective orders that restrict how AI tools may process confidential information, limiting training, data retention, and output deletion.

Matthew Thomas argues that artificial intelligence can accelerate routine legal work but cannot replicate human judgment in in-house practice. Writing in Above the Law, Thomas contends that AI tools now reliably summarize contracts, draft clauses, compare agreements, and flag potential issues—but they remain unable to determine which issues warrant negotiation, acceptance, or deprioritization based on business context.

Fastcase Inc., the legal research platform owned by Clio, sued Canadian AI company Alexi Technologies Inc. in federal court in Washington, D.C. on November 26, 2025, alleging breach of a 2021 data license agreement. Fastcase claims Alexi used licensed case law to train commercial generative AI models and display full-text decisions to users—uses explicitly prohibited under the original contract's "internal research purposes" restriction. The agreement permitted Alexi's staff attorneys to prepare client memoranda using the data, not to build a public, competing legal research platform. Fastcase seeks an injunction requiring Alexi to destroy both the datasets and the AI models trained on them, treating the model weights as infringing derivative works.