About
Contracts

Contracts

9 entries in Litigator Tracker

9 Contributing Entries

Anthropic and Pentagon Clash Over AI Guardrails, Leading to Contract Termination

The Department of War terminated its $200 million partnership with AI firm Anthropic on February 27, 2026, after the company refused to remove safety restrictions on its Claude model for military use. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had issued a three-day ultimatum on February 24 demanding Anthropic disable all guardrails. When CEO Dario Amodei declined, Hegseth designated Anthropic a "supply chain risk," and President Trump issued a presidential order barring all federal agencies from using Anthropic's systems. The dispute centered on two non-negotiable demands from Anthropic: no fully autonomous lethal weapons and no mass surveillance of Americans.

MRED cuts Zillow’s Chicago feed over 9 Compass listings, blocking 43,000 listings

Zillow lost access to roughly 43,000 Chicago-area home listings—approximately 60% of active inventory in the region—after Midwest Real Estate Data (MRED), the local MLS provider, cut off Zillow's listing feed. The cutoff followed MRED's accusation that Zillow breached its licensing agreement by refusing to display a small number of Compass Private Exclusive listings in California, Florida, and Georgia. Compass, Chicago's largest real estate brokerage, has simultaneously pulled its listings from Zillow across multiple states, compounding the dispute.

Shoosmiths Launches Project Apollo AI Contract Review Platform Built with Microsoft

Shoosmiths, a UK law firm, launched Project Apollo on Wednesday—a proprietary generative AI system for contract review developed over twelve months in partnership with Microsoft. The tool runs on Microsoft Azure and is designed to explain its reasoning, surface the firm's internal playbooks, and train junior lawyers by modeling how senior associates approach contract work. Unlike black-box AI systems, Project Apollo justifies each recommendation with grounded analysis tied to Shoosmiths' risk positions and preferred language.

StubHub Sued by World Cup Fans Over Last-Minute Ticket Cancellations

StubHub faces a proposed class-action lawsuit in federal court in Manhattan after canceling thousands of World Cup tickets hours before matches in June, leaving fans with non-refundable travel costs and only partial refunds. The complaint alleges the ticket reseller engaged in false and misleading sales practices, including promoting an unverified "Fan Protect Guarantee" that promised ticket authenticity but failed to deliver. Plaintiffs Julia Reeker Moghal of Orange County and Reuben Renteria of Los Angeles paid $1,905 and $2,294 respectively for tickets that were either never issued or canceled after they arrived at venues. The suit seeks at least $5 million in damages on behalf of thousands of affected U.S. fans and demands StubHub be barred from selling World Cup tickets, with profits redirected to customers.

AI Forces In-House Lawyers to Rethink Outsourcing Deals

AI is reshaping outsourcing arrangements faster than most legal departments can adapt, forcing in-house teams to fundamentally restructure how they acquire and manage vendor relationships. Irina Beschieriu, an outsourcing and technology contracts attorney with 18 years of experience, has identified a critical strategic shift: legal departments must move away from lengthy, contract-heavy agreements toward governance frameworks built on stronger incentives and technical competency in evaluating AI offerings. The Association of Corporate Counsel and Everwell released survey data showing 52% of in-house legal teams now use AI tools—primarily for contract drafting, review, redlining, and due diligence—yet only 7% have achieved measurable cost reductions.

Court denies contempt motion in Cortlandt St. v. TPG Capital dispute

New York Supreme Court Justice Robert Reed denied a contempt motion filed by Cortlandt St. Recovery Corp. against TPG Capital Management, L.P. and related defendants, ruling that the defendants did not violate court orders by filing a motion to dismiss in response to an amended complaint. The Commercial Division decision, issued in 2026, held that individual defendants retained the right to oppose the amended complaint and that no sanctions could be imposed for doing so. Cortlandt had argued that the defendants' continued litigation efforts constituted sanctionable conduct on a claim destined to fail.

Court dismisses fraud claim in Johnson Matthey sale despite warranty breach

The UK Commercial Court has dismissed a buyer's claim for fraudulent breach of warranty in the £1 billion-plus sale of Johnson Matthey's Health Business, despite finding that the seller had breached a warranty by failing to disclose a significant price-match request. In Veranova Bidco LP v Johnson Matthey Plc [2026] EWHC 1021, Dias J ruled that the buyer could not establish fraud because it failed to prove that any single executive acted dishonestly. The judgment, handed down on 1 May 2026 following a five-week trial in November–December 2025, reinforces a demanding standard: corporate fraud requires proof of conscious dishonesty attributable to one identifiable individual, not merely aggregated knowledge across multiple executives.

mail Subscribe to Contracts email updates

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

Also on LawSnap