What If We’re Just Mad This March? — See Generally

Published
Score
8

Why it matters

Above the Law's "What If We’re Just Mad This March? — See Generally" (published March 22, 2026) is a satirical newsletter aggregating recent legal controversies, framed as a "March anger bracket" parodying NCAA Madness, where readers vote on which Trump administration lawyers deserve disbarment first across four regions.[INPUT]

Key stories include: (1) ATL Bracket pitting Trump lawyers like Rudy Giuliani for ethical violations warranting bar discipline; (2) A top Biglaw firm (Top 10) shutting down its Tampa back-office amid AI-driven restructuring and staff cuts; (3) A judge ejecting a DOJ lawyer and criticizing the NJ US Attorney's Office for chaotic management risking child predator cases; (4) Deputy AG Todd Blanche allegedly prioritizing redaction of Epstein files to shield accomplices; (5) Weil Gotshal naming Ramona Nee as its first female executive partner; (6) President Trump's 1,000-word late-night rant against the Supreme Court amid crises like Iran war and DHS shutdown; (7) Afroman defending against a defamation suit by police over raid mockery.[INPUT]

This roundup reflects ongoing 2026 tensions in Trump's second term, building on prior events like DOJ dropping sanctions appeals against firms (Jenner & Block, WilmerHale, Perkins Coie, Susman Godfrey) on March 2 for opposing his policies,[1] AG Pam Bondi's February 26 proposal to preempt state bar ethics probes of DOJ attorneys,[3][4] and D.C. Bar scrutiny of pardon attorney Ed Martin for threatening Georgetown Law over DEI teachings.[5] Broader context involves Trump lawyers' repeated court lies, ethics lapses, and bar inaction, as criticized in January analyses calling for disbarments.[2]

Newsworthy now (days before March 26) due to peaking public outrage over DOJ weaponization, Trump legal team's unaccountability amid high-stakes crises (Epstein files, child safety, international conflicts), and symbolic voting bracket amplifying calls for professional discipline when federal immunities shield misconduct.[1][2][3][4][5][INPUT]

Sources

mail

Get notified about new Employment Law developments

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

See more entries tagged Employment Law.