About

US Treasury urges IMF and G20 partners to adopt "super intelligence" in place of AI

Published
Score
11

Why it matters

US Treasury Under Secretary for International Affairs Erin Browne told Reuters in Bangkok that Washington wants IMF partners to replace "artificial intelligence" with "super intelligence." Browne said the US is negotiating with other IMF shareholders over proposed wording for a statement being prepared by the International Monetary and Financial Committee (IMFC), the fund's steering committee. She argued the term better fits the technology, and said the US, which holds the rotating Group of 20 presidency, wants the usage to spread internationally. The push follows a September directive from President Donald Trump telling federal agencies to use "super intelligence" instead of "artificial intelligence" in official communications and non-statutory documents. That order does not make the term an internationally recognized replacement for AI.

The final wording of the IMFC statement is not yet public. It is unclear whether the US will block a consensus statement if "super intelligence" is left out, though Washington has said it may. If no consensus emerges, Saudi Finance Minister Mohammed Al-Jadaan, the current IMFC chair, could issue a chair's statement summarizing members' views. A source said one option is to drop both "super intelligence" and "artificial intelligence" and refer instead to "new technology." The IMFC news conference and any agreed statement are scheduled for Saturday, led by Al-Jadaan and IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva. US officials reportedly told colleagues during IMFC statement meetings that they would insist on the new language, which has raised eyebrows among some other members. Browne spoke at the IMF/World Bank 2026 Annual Meetings in Bangkok. All coverage so far traces to that single Reuters interview, so the final wording and whether the US will refuse to sign remain unconfirmed.

The statement is due within days, and its outcome will show whether Washington can move allies on terminology. For attorneys advising clients on AI disclosures, regulatory filings, or contracts, the order governs federal communications, not statutes or private documents, so there is no reason yet to redraft around "super intelligence." Watch Saturday's IMFC communiqué or chair's statement for the exact term used and for any public US objection.

Sources

mail Subscribe to Artificial Intelligence email updates

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

Also on LawSnap