About

OCC Issues Examiner Framework for Banks' Generative and Agentic "Super Intelligence" AI Use

Published
Score
24

Why it matters

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency published a 22-page examiner framework on November 4, 2026, titled "Super Intelligence: Supervisory Framework," alongside OCC Bulletin 2026-54. The framework gives examiners a structured way to review banks' generative and agentic AI in credit decisions, payments, fraud detection, customer service, and operations. It organizes its considerations into 16 components across six pillars: purpose, risk, control, oversight, resilience, and assurance. Its core test is that classification "may be based on potential consequences, transfer of agency, and the degree of human oversight, rather than the technical sophistication" of the system. The term "Super Intelligence" (SI) comes from a September 29, 2026 executive order that replaced "artificial intelligence." The framework's scope runs from conventional AI to autonomous agents and includes outside AI agents that reach a bank through its own channels.

The framework creates no binding obligations. The bulletin states that it does not establish supervisory expectations or enforceable standards, and it does not create new regulatory expectations. Examiners should not treat AI as a separate risk category, and banks do not need a standalone AI risk appetite. The framework also treats vendor reliance as a source of model, data, legal, concentration, and resilience risk that standard service-level and security reviews do not fully cover. A follow-up is still pending. The agencies plan to issue a request for information on model risk management generally, with a specific look at AI, but have not set a date. The OCC has also said it will update the framework regularly.

The framework fills a gap left by OCC Bulletin 2026-13, the April 2026 revised interagency model risk guidance, which explicitly excluded generative and agentic AI from its scope. It is the first OCC-specific supervisory guide for agentic AI. Attorneys should expect it to shape vendor contracts and fintech partnerships, because it ties the level of control a bank must apply to what an AI tool can do without human direction. Watch for the forthcoming request for information and for revisions to the framework.

Sources

mail Subscribe to Artificial Intelligence email updates

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

Also on LawSnap