About

Nvidia and CEO Jensen Huang sued by shareholders over alleged affair with suspected Chinese spy

Published
Score
42

Why it matters

Shareholder Mark Kistenmacher, represented by Rosen Law Firm, filed a proposed class action in federal court in San Jose, California, against Nvidia and CEO Jensen Huang. The complaint alleges that Nvidia and Huang misled investors about the national security implications of Huang's relationship with Alice Huang, a Chinese executive linked to Megaspeed, a Singapore data center firm that buys Nvidia chips. The suit says those statements "artificially inflated" Nvidia's share price and seeks unspecified damages for anyone who bought Nvidia stock between October 9, when The New York Times first reported the pair socializing in Taiwan, and November 8, when the company said it was investigating reports that Huang was the "target of a foreign intelligence effort." The New York Times reported on Oct. 29 that U.S. officials had concluded Alice Huang was "a Chinese intelligence asset." Nvidia has launched an independent investigation led by former federal prosecutor Joon H. Kim, and Huang has acknowledged the affair in an internal message.

Much remains unresolved. It is not known what information Alice Huang is alleged to have obtained, whether any sensitive material reached Beijing, or how much Jensen Huang knew about her activities. The complaint's allegations are unproven. Reports differ on the filing time, with AP saying the suit was filed Monday in California and others saying it was filed shortly after the market close. Trump said Tuesday that the FBI is also investigating Nvidia and Huang, and House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Brian Mast has said he is ready to subpoena Huang. Neither the FBI nor the committee has released details of its inquiry.

For attorneys, the immediate questions are scope and sequence. Watch whether the court consolidates this suit with others and who is appointed lead plaintiff, since that will shape the class and the damages theory. Track the Kim investigation's findings and any subpoena from the House committee, because either could generate disclosures that feed securities claims. The stock fell $7.97 to $178.67 on Monday, erasing about $190 billion in market value, and closed as low as $166.95, about 31% below its recent peak. That decline sets the loss figures plaintiffs will use, so the class period dates matter for any client who bought or sold during this window.

Sources

mail Subscribe to Artificial Intelligence email updates

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

Also on LawSnap