About

Judge slams $85 million fee bid in Google Play Store antitrust settlement

Published
Score
13

Why it matters

U.S. District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton has rejected class counsel's request for $85 million in attorney fees from the $700 million Google Play Store antitrust settlement, calling the demand "shockingly huge" and "patently unreasonable." The dispute centers solely on lawyer compensation, not the consumer payout itself.

The 2023 settlement resolves claims by consumer plaintiffs and 53 state attorneys general alleging anticompetitive conduct in the Google Play Store. It provides approximately $630 million to consumers who purchased apps or in-app content between August 2016 and September 2023, $70 million for states' sovereign claims, and requires Google to modify several Play Store business practices. Final court approval is scheduled for April 30, 2026, with consumer notice having begun in late 2025.

Judge Hamilton's criticism arrives as the settlement moves toward final approval, creating a potential obstacle to closing the deal. The fee dispute matters because it signals judicial skepticism about the proportionality of legal fees in high-stakes settlements and because the Play Store case sits within a broader pattern of antitrust pressure on Google spanning search, advertising technology, and app distribution. How the court resolves the fee request will likely influence fee negotiations in comparable tech antitrust settlements.

mail Subscribe to Antitrust email updates

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

Also on LawSnap