About

Judge Rejects Vrdolyak Law Group's Bid to Dismiss Wiretapping Lawsuit

Published
Score
12

Why it matters

U.S. District Judge Mary Rowland substantially rejected Vrdolyak Law Group's motion to dismiss a class action lawsuit alleging the firm secretly recorded employees' and clients' phone calls in violation of federal and state privacy laws. The January 17 ruling allows most claims to proceed under the Federal Wiretap Act and related state statutes, though Rowland dismissed fraud allegations. A status hearing is scheduled for May 18 to set a trial date and discuss settlement.

Daniel Alholm, a former staff member at the firm founded by ex-Chicago Alderman Edward Vrdolyak, filed the putative class action in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Vrdolyak Law Group argued the claims were untimely and sought to eliminate supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims. The court rejected both positions.

Attorneys should monitor this case closely. The ruling clears a significant hurdle for a class action involving federal wiretapping statutes against a prominent Chicago firm, exposing Vrdolyak Law Group to substantial liability and broad discovery into its recording practices. The May 18 status hearing will signal whether settlement discussions are progressing or whether the parties are headed toward trial.

mail Subscribe to Privacy email updates

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

Also on LawSnap