House Republicans Introduce SECURE Data Act for National Privacy Framework

Published
Score
13

Why it matters

House Republicans introduced a comprehensive federal privacy bill on April 22, 2026, aimed at establishing uniform national standards for consumer data. The Securing and Establishing Consumer Uniform Rights and Enforcement over Data Act (SECURE Data Act), sponsored by the Energy & Commerce Committee's Privacy Working Group and led by Chair John Joyce (R-Pa.), grants consumers rights to access, correct, delete, and port personal data. It also permits opt-outs from targeted advertising, data sales, and certain profiling activities. The bill requires data minimization, mandates consent for sensitive data collection including from minors under 16, and establishes FTC registration requirements for data brokers. A companion measure, the GUARD Financial Data Act from the Financial Services Committee, modernizes privacy protections under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act with similar consumer rights. The bills apply to businesses under FTC jurisdiction that process data from over 200,000 U.S. consumers annually with revenue exceeding $25 million, or derive at least 25 percent of revenue from data sales.

The legislation preempts existing state privacy laws to create uniformity, developed with input from over 170 organizations. Enforcement authority rests with the FTC and state attorneys general, with no private right of action. The bills notably lack Democratic support, with Ranking Member Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) criticizing them for weakening consumer protections and enabling broad data use for artificial intelligence applications. The scope and specific enforcement mechanisms remain subject to committee markup and amendment.

The bills represent a rare moment of Republican coordination across committees on a consumer protection issue, driven partly by industry demands for a single national standard to replace the current patchwork of 20-plus state laws. However, the legislation faces Democratic opposition and a history of failed federal privacy efforts. Attorneys should monitor committee proceedings and amendments closely, as the preemption language will significantly affect compliance obligations for clients operating across multiple states.

mail

Get notified about new Privacy developments

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

Also on LawSnap