The dictionary's scope and specific definitions remain unpublished. The extent to which the resource addresses liability concerns, AI hallucination risks, or regulatory compliance issues is unclear. Whether the dictionary will be freely available or restricted to CosmoLex users has not been disclosed.
Attorneys should monitor this resource as a barometer for how the legal technology industry is framing AI adoption. The dictionary's framing matters: how vendors and platforms define terms like "AI," "learning," and "reliability" will shape how courts, bar associations, and malpractice insurers evaluate attorney obligations around these tools. As AI integration accelerates faster than its reliability improves, standardized terminology becomes a proxy for standardized expectations around competence and disclosure. Practitioners should review the dictionary's definitions against their own vendor agreements and consider whether the industry's language matches their actual tool performance.