USPTO Allows Patent Owners Pre-Order Responses in Ex Parte Reexams Before SNQ Ruling[1][2][3]

Published
Score
7

Why it matters

On April 1, 2026, USPTO Director John A. Squires issued an Official Gazette Notice introducing a new "pre-order procedure" for ex parte reexaminations, allowing patent owners to file a limited response—up to 30 pages, within 30 days of service of the request—arguing why the third-party request does not raise a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) under 35 U.S.C. § 303(a).[1][2][3][7][8][9] This applies to requests filed on or after April 5, 2026, with no extensions, fees, or petitions required; submissions must be served on the requester and exclude § 325(d) arguments or prior analyses.[1][3][4][7][8] The USPTO will consider these papers in its SNQ determination, waiving rules in 37 CFR §§ 1.530 and 1.540 that previously barred owner input before ordering reexamination.[8][9]

Key players: USPTO (led by Director Squires), patent owners, and third-party requesters; no specific companies or legislation named, though the procedure addresses procedures under 35 U.S.C. §§ 302-304.[1][7][8][11] Ex parte reexamination filings have surged since 2025 USPTO policies reduced inter partes review (IPR) institutions at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, making ex parte a preferred patent challenge outside courts due to no discretionary denials (e.g., Fintiv factors), no estoppel under § 315(e), and a lighter SNQ standard.[1][2][5][6][7]

Timeline and context: Traditional ex parte process (over 40 years old) evaluated requests solely on requester's submission for SNQ before ordering reexam; owners responded only post-order.[1][3][11] IPR/PGR decline since 2025 drove ex parte requests above IPR/PGR levels, prompting USPTO to aid examiners' 3-month SNQ timeline with owner input.[1][2][6] This experimental procedure signals potential future rulemaking if effective.[7]

Newsworthy now: Announced April 1 and effective April 5, 2026—just days before current date—it equips patent owners with an early defense tool amid rising ex parte challenges, potentially blocking reexams at the threshold and reshaping strategy versus full proceedings.[1][2][4][7] Practitioners view it as a "modest win" for owners, though outcomes depend on uptake.[4][7]

Sources

mail

Get notified about new Intellectual Property developments

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

See more entries tagged Intellectual Property.