Modern BYOD data collection shifts from device imaging to targeted evidence gathering

Published
Score
7

Why it matters

ModeOne has published guidance recommending that legal teams overhaul how they collect data from employee personal devices during litigation and investigations. The analysis, published on JDSupra, argues that traditional BYOD collection methods—which require full forensic imaging of devices—are outdated and create unnecessary delays, privacy exposure, and employee resistance. Instead, legal teams should adopt a "scope-first" methodology that targets only relevant data by date range, participant, or data type rather than capturing entire devices.

The shift reflects a fundamental mismatch between workplace technology and discovery practice. BYOD adoption accelerated during the pandemic as organizations moved to remote work, and hybrid arrangements have since become standard. Yet legal teams continue relying on 2015-era collection methods requiring device shipment, in-person scheduling, and complete imaging. Meanwhile, security concerns have intensified—57% of enterprises report it is increasingly difficult to secure devices used outside the office, and over half are considering personal device bans altogether.

Attorneys managing BYOD programs should assess whether their current collection protocols match available technology. Remote collection methods now exist that complete data extraction in hours, protect employee privacy, and maintain defensible chain-of-custody logs. The gap between these capabilities and outdated practice creates both operational friction and potential liability exposure. As hybrid work becomes permanent infrastructure rather than temporary accommodation, updating collection methodology has moved from a nice-to-have to a practical necessity for managing cost, timeline, and employee relations in discovery.

mail

Get notified about new Privacy developments

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

See more entries tagged Privacy.

Also on LawSnap