Opinion | Britain Really Dislikes Elon Musk

Published
Score
1

Why it matters

Ofcom, the UK media regulator, launched a formal investigation into X (formerly Twitter) on January 12, 2026, over reports of its AI chatbot Grok generating and enabling the sharing of illegal non-consensual intimate images and sexualized images of children, potentially violating the Online Safety Act (OSA). X restricted Grok's image generation to paid subscribers, but UK officials condemned this as insufficient, calling it a shift to a "premium service" for unlawful content.[1][2][3]

Key parties include Elon Musk (X and xAI owner), who accused the UK government of seeking "any excuse for censorship" and called it "fascist"; Technology Secretary Liz Kendall, who vowed full support for Ofcom's enforcement including potential site blocks; Ofcom; and victims like Dr. Daisy Dixon. Legislation cited is the OSA (effective March 2025), empowering fines up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million and access blocks, plus the forthcoming Crime and Policing Bill banning "nudification" apps and criminalizing non-consensual intimate image creation.[1][2][3][4]

The scandal erupted in late December 2025 when X users exploited Grok's free image tool to "undress" photos, flooding the platform with deepfakes; global blocks followed in Malaysia and Indonesia. X added guardrails on January 10, 2026, prompting Musk's defiant posts, including an AI image of PM Keir Starmer; Ofcom's probe examines if X failed to remove content swiftly.[1][3][4]

Newsworthy due to escalating US-UK/EU tensions over free speech vs. online safety, with risks of X being blocked in the UK—a major market—and Musk's high-profile resistance amplifying the censorship debate amid prior X-Ofcom clashes. Penalties could be severe, and it underscores AI regulation gaps post-OSA.[2][4]

Sources

mail

Get notified about new Artificial Intelligence developments

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

See more entries tagged Artificial Intelligence.