About

Judge Sanctions Quinn Emanuel $3M for Ethics Violations in Natera Trial

Published
Score
11

Why it matters

U.S. District Judge Edward M. Chen sanctioned Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan nearly $3.1 million in the Northern District of California after finding the firm systematically misled the court while representing medical testing company Natera Inc. in a false-claims dispute against competitor Guardant Health. The court imposed $3 million in compensatory sanctions, a $100,000 punitive fine, and required partners Andrew Bramhall, Brian Cannon, Victoria Maroulis, and Margaret Shyr, along with associate Elle Wang, to complete eight hours of legal ethics training. Quinn Emanuel must develop the training curriculum itself.

Judge Chen found that Quinn Emanuel's litigation team repeatedly failed to disclose or correct misleading statements about expert witnesses and deliberately avoided confronting factual problems during trial. The court deferred certain findings against Maroulis and Shyr, while Bramhall, Cannon, and Wang face additional individual sanctions. The sanctions order followed a special master's recommendation and focused on attorney conduct rather than the underlying merits of the Natera-Guardant Health business dispute.

The magnitude of the sanction and its form are unusual. Courts rarely impose penalties this large for ethics violations alone, and requiring a major firm to author its own ethics training is an extraordinary remedy that signals judicial skepticism about Quinn Emanuel's internal culture. Judge Chen explicitly characterized the conduct as reflecting systemic problems rather than isolated mistakes. Attorneys should monitor whether the court issues additional sanctions against other lawyers involved in the case and whether this decision influences how other judges assess firm-wide responsibility for litigation misconduct.

mail Subscribe to Litigation email updates

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

Also on LawSnap